Seattle - St. LouisOn the news rack in
Seattle and St. Louis |Chuck
Foster publishes two great monthly papers.|
Content races from edgy
music to edgy politics with all 7 deadly sins between the sheets.
Focus is Liberty - Music - Freedom of Expression - Association - Speech - Press
On the Web
Henry Nicolle's essays have been published by the Sinners since June 2007
Politics in an Apolitical Society
Essay by Henry Nicolle
you want to keep your friends and a happy marriage, learn to leave
religion and politics for the preachers and politicians." We have heard
those words of advice for thousands of years, except during those short
periods of ecstacy and ambition when political correctness demanded
open averment or aggressive re-education.
What exactly is
"politics and religion". Is politics singular, or plural? Is there a
thing which is a politic? Is religion singular or plural? It seems to
me that quibbling over little terms is as stupid as warring over one or
the other. In the end, the questions are unanswered and probably are
unanswerable. Still, we fight and die, murder and rape to push one
worn-out idea or another ahead of other suitable frayed rags of
insanity. Politics is religion and religion is pure politics.
have recently heard and read of people asking if there has ever been a
war started by the population instead of by the handful who claim to
speak for the multitudes. In less than civilized societies, I think it
is possible that the People may occasionally go to war, instead of
their leaders taking the people to war. The issues of a small people
are comprehended by the people. If the rulers serve the thinking
and deciding, then I think the people are merely tools, resources and
victims for ambitious wars.
What makes a "Just War"? Can a war be "just" at all? Can there be an innocent bystander in any war?
to question 1. I don't think so. Any Just war must be opposing
injustice. One is the obverse of the face of the coin. The conflict of
Justice and Injustice expressed in the term "just war" twists the term
into an oxymoron. To be a just war requires a conflict in the
Answer to question 2. See answer to question 1.
to question 3. Yes and No. What distance from the aggressor establishes
innocense? It seems to me that all inhabitants of an aggressing society
are not innocent. There is no such thing as an innocent aggressor.
Ignorant, lazy, inactive, reluctant, disruptive, antagonistic and many
less than helpful to the war victims, but innocent aggressor? "No."
a defender be innocent? Perhaps. Innocense is defiled by encouragement
and incitement to attack. Lincoln incited, provoked and
encouraged attack on Fort Sumter in order to claim that the fort had
been an innocent bystander in a vile aggression by Southern forces.
Sherman's march to the sea, the Cheyenne Trail of Tears and other
monstrous campaigns, the men, women and children who were massacred as
a "Lesson to those who would rebel or resist." were as close to
innocent as possible, but were not bystanders.
The Founders of
our country were not innocents by any mode of thought. They created a
country and a process of self-governing that they could agree was not
perfect, but which offered a real prospect for true social Liberty,
evolving to be free of domination by the ambitious few and from the
soulless insanity of the majority. They left the future to our hand and
will and we will leave whatever remains of Liberty to our children to
make of it what they will.
So, War. We, of the United States,
are the greatest generators of War the world has ever known. Our
victims in war number greater than any other empire before our time.
There is promise in the wind that our cache of victims has been
infected by an inflation nearly matching our worthless Federal Reserve
"dollars". Millions have died at our hand to improve the Glory and
Status of our government in the community of governments and to gather
the wealth of nations into the purses of our elite and powerful.
wars of three-score years past are preludes to greater ambitions of
Empire. They have discovered that we are nothing more than willing and
passive resources to create wealth that can be harvested from us, from
our labors and creativity, from our bodies and organs and from our
future and our progeny's far future. Bodies to feed armies and Wealth
to feed wars.
We have now several forever wars inflicted upon
our selves and linked segments of a forever war upon the weaker people
of the world. We have more war anxious in the wings.
requires that we make the open declaration of war to commit our bodies,
wealth and security to armed conflict. Do I need to add that nobody has
asked our advice for almost a century? None of our wars without our
consent can be just, no more than they can be called anything but
treason. Treason in the Constitutional definition sense.
We hang traitors.
Liberty is never Easy, Safe or totally Free!